Re: [RML] New Topic

jazep at www.peter.unmack.net
Mon, 31 Mar 1997 09:50:25 -0700 (MST)

Mike, Bruce, and Chris

Yes, Bruce, the trade does have a couple of publications that go out, and
we also have a branch of PIJAC here. That is a very good idea, and I would
like to take this time to suggest that all of us on this list that are in
the business, or who happen to write articles for the "big" pubs anyhow,
begin writing articles/letters to the editor(s) of these publications (and
even the hobby ones, really). It would probably also be a good idea to
list the RML, the various Sahul fishes groups, and some of the better
websites as sources of up-to-date info in those articles/letters so that
the dealers would have a place to go for more info.

I shall start on my letter as soon as time permits. I get one of those
trade pubs at work, so I will start w/ that one. :) Lets make this another
"official" group project, and try to keep one another updated on our
progress??

Julie <><

________________________________________________________________________

On Mon, 31 Mar 1997, Bruce Hansen wrote:

> Hey mike,
>
> We just have to keep chipping away at them and using everything we can to
> make them see that it will be better in the long run if they stick to
> quality. It costs just as much to feed a bad fish as a good one.
>
> Does the trade have a publication that goes out to members like retail
> shops etc like PIJAC does here? Perhaps you could write a small appeal for
> quality and purity - if complaints affect sales then perhaps thre
> wholesalers may get the point after all !
>
> Cheers
>
> Bruce
>
> Bruce Hansen, ANGFA
> Check out our web site a http://www.angfa.org
> Remember, "When in doubt, leave it out!"
>
> ----------
> > From: Mike Adams <mfadam1 at pop.uky.edu>
> > To: rainbowfish at pcug.org.au
> > Subject: Re: [RML] New Topic
> > Date: Monday, 31 March 1997 8:32
> >
> >
> > The sad thing is a large wholesaler isn't going to give a flip if I call
> > them on it.
> >
>
>