RE: Albino rainbowfish

peter.unmack at ASU.Edu
Sun, 02 Jun 1996 11:55:24 -0700 (MST)

On Sun, 2 Jun 1996, Andrew Boyd wrote:

> I think that "scientifically controlled crossing" would have to mean
> "terminate with extreme prejudice as soon as experiment over".

That I agree with. I also think albinos deserve the same treatment.

> The albinos
> would be nothing more than 'toys', commercial exploitation, but the xbreeds,
> if they found their way into the hobby, could prejudice future breeding
> efforts.

I agree with your comments on the hybrids but take difference to
albinos. I think I have adequately explained why in an earlier post today.

> Who would potential breeders know who to trust?

Well, I would trust someone like Roy Hunter (even if no one else
would...:-) ) to keep, but never breed an albino. Mind you, I doubt that
he would want to keep them.

But the albinos,
> such as they are, should they ever eventuate, will stick out like the
> proverbial canine gonads.

Except if you end up with recessive alleles that you can't see.

Now having albino rainbows, that would really make your "dumb blonds"
story even closer to reality. :-)

Tootles

Peter Unmack