Re: [RML] forced diet ok?

Ed Romana (erom at earthlink.net)
Sun, 23 Feb 1997 09:58:48 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Lyndle Schenck: "Re: [RML] Looking for G. wanamensis -Reply -Reply"
Previous message: Harro Hieronimus: "RE: [RML] RML: "red bosmani" ?"
Maybe in reply to: VERMILLION, DIANNE: "[RML] forced diet ok?"
Next in thread: James E. Capelle: "Re: [RML] forced diet ok?"

In my experience this netiquette point has the potential to start
a fierce flame war, nevertheless my preference is also to post
the reply on top. When following a thread I am usually aware of previous
messages so there is no need to review then and scroll down

Ed Romana.

***************************************************************
At 08:20 AM 23/2/97 -0700, you wrote:
>James, Any chance you could put your reply at the top of the message
>instead of the bottom?? Makes it easier to read when you do not need to
>search for the message...
>
>Thanks
>
>Roy Hunter
>Co-Chairman
>ANGFA of North America
>visit our website at:
>http://208.135.166.41
>
>----------
<snip>>
/********************************************************

Next message: Lyndle Schenck: "Re: [RML] Looking for G. wanamensis -Reply -Reply"
Previous message: Harro Hieronimus: "RE: [RML] RML: "red bosmani" ?"
Maybe in reply to: VERMILLION, DIANNE: "[RML] forced diet ok?"
Next in thread: James E. Capelle: "Re: [RML] forced diet ok?"